QUESTION:
 How much authority do elders have in leading the 
flock? Should they seek input from the flock? Is 
it right for them to rule the church with no
consideration for the desires of the members ?
 

ANSWER:
 Answer: There is an old saying that decrees "there can be no government without the 
consent of the governed." Many have tried but most, if not all, have failed. There 
is little doubt that the elders in a congregation have authority. That authority 
comes from the scriptures. Duties of elders include: such things as feeding the 
flock Acts 20:28, ruling well 1 Timothy 5:17, watching in behalf of souls Heb. 
13:17, administering discipline 1 Thess. 5:2-14, helping the weak Acts 20:35, 
watching for wolves Acts 20:29-31, and acting as official representatives of the 
congregation Acts 1 1 :29-30, Acts 21 : 17- 18, and Acts 20:17-37. The authority for 
so acting is inherent in each command. In other words elders have the authority to 
act in behalf of the congregation in the matters listed above because the command 
for them to do so authorizes such actions. It would be foolish indeed, however, if 
elders acted without consulting the congregation in matters where appropriate. There 
are numerous situations where input from the congregation would be invaluable. Men 
properly qualified and suited to the office of elder realize this and create a 
working relationship with the entire congregation. Getting to know, evaluate, and 
appreciate the flock over which they rule is essential to successful government. 
Abuse of power or authority always leads to discontent and eventual anarchy. This 
can and should be avoided by wise elders whose care and concern for the flock over 
which they rule is evidenced by their actions